What is a one sentence summary of your feature request?
The “Change Type” field in the change log should be renamed or supplemented with a clearer label so users understand it reflects the change policy group used for evaluation, not who performed the edit or how it was made.
Please describe your idea in detail. What is your problem, why do you feel this idea is the best solution, etc.
When a user manually edits a customization that is associated with a managed bundle or SuiteApp, the change log displays the Change Type as “Managed Bundle/App Update.” This label is misleading because it implies the change originated from a bundle or app deployment, when in reality it reflects the change policy group that Platform Governance used to evaluate and classify the record. The actual edit was performed manually by the user. The suggestion is to rename the field to something more descriptive, such as “Policy Group” or “Evaluated Under,” or to add a secondary field that separately captures how the change was actually made (manual vs. automated/bundle deployment). This would allow users to distinguish between the governance evaluation category and the true origin of the change without needing to open the underlying record and its history tab to reconcile the two.
How do you currently solve the challenges you have by not having this feature?
Customers must open the underlying custom record and review its history tab to confirm the edit was performed manually, then cross-reference that with the change log entry and the related change request. This is manual, time-consuming, and not intuitive for users who rely on the change log as their primary source of truth.