# Workstation field is not available in activity records generated from the Isilon data source in Netwrix Auditor

**URL:** <https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951>\
**Category:** Auditor Ideas\
**Tags:** auditor, completed\
**Created:** [November 12, 2025, 11:34am UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951 "2025-11-12T11:34:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Massimiliano](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/848f3c/32.png) [@Massimiliano](https://community.netwrix.com/u/Massimiliano)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2025, 11:34am UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951/1 "2025-11-12T11:34:36Z")

</div>

### What is a one sentence summary of your feature request?

Workstation field is not available in activity records generated from the Isilon data source in Netwrix Auditor

### Please describe your idea in detail. What is your problem, why do you feel this idea is the best solution, etc.

We have Netwrix Auditor 10.8 (Build 15066) with a File Server monitoring plan for an Isilon A300 based on OneFS Version: 9.10.1.2.

Workstation field is not available in activity records generated from the Isilon data source even if in original logs from Isilon the value is present.

We have no errors but in the Search view Workstation field is missing.

It would be very useful to have the workstation field populated for operations aimed at identifying the source from which the action on the files occurred. This is something that is already available in the File Server monitoring plan for Windows servers.

### How do you currently solve the challenges you have by not having this feature?

Unfortunately I didn’t solve it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aleksander.tyrnov](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/netwrix/user_avatar/community.netwrix.com/aleksander.tyrnov/32/1503_2.png) [@aleksander.tyrnov](https://community.netwrix.com/u/aleksander.tyrnov)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2025, 12:42pm UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951/2 "2025-11-17T12:42:13Z")

</div>

Hi Max,

Thanks a lot for sharing this. You’re right, the **Workstation** field isn’t currently showing up for **Isilon data sources**.

We’ve logged this as a **feature request** to bring full support for the Workstation field in **Netwrix Auditor for File Servers – Isilon** just like it does for Windows file servers.

We know how useful this is for tracking where file activity comes from, and we’ll keep the community updated once it moves forward.

Appreciate you taking the time to flag this!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Massimiliano](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/848f3c/32.png) [@Massimiliano](https://community.netwrix.com/u/Massimiliano)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2025, 1:23pm UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951/3 "2025-11-17T13:23:26Z")

</div>

Thank you **[Aleksander](https://community.netwrix.com/u/aleksander.tyrnov),**

We look forward to receiving your update

Best regards

Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8e8cbc/32.png) [@TheCat](https://community.netwrix.com/u/TheCat)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2026, 9:56am UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/workstation-field-is-not-available-in-activity-records-generated-from-the-isilon-data-source-in-netwrix-auditor/117951/4 "2026-10-09T09:56:40Z")

</div>

Good afternoon.

The workstation field was populated in the latest version, 10.9.  
You can upgrade and the workstation field should be field with IP address,

Thank you,  
Evgenii
