Redesign Denylists - Applications UI: Support Bulk Process Import and Streamline List Management

Products Endpoint Protector Ideas
, , ,
1

Which aspect of EPP are you submitting for?

Endpoint Protector Server

What is a one sentence summary of your feature request?

Redesign the Application Denylist interface to support bulk process registration and simplify list management operations.

Please describe your idea in detail. What is your problem, why do you feel this idea is the best solution, etc.

Problem:

No Bulk Import Support: Administrators must add blocked application processes one by one, which is extremely inefficient when configuring large lists of unauthorized applications.

Confusing List Management: Disabling a registered process requires unchecking check boxes rather than performing a standard delete or toggle operation, leading to operational confusion and accidental misconfigurations.

General UI Inefficiency: The overall interface and workflow for application blocking lack modern table management standards (e.g., search, bulk actions, clear status toggles).

Proposed Solution:

Bulk Registration Feature: Allow administrators to import multiple application executable names or paths at once via text list or CSV upload.

Simplified Status & Delete Operations: Introduce clear status toggles (Enable/Disable) and standard Delete actions to remove entries cleanly without relying on checkbox unchecking logic.

Overall UI Overhaul: Update the Application Denylist page with multi-select capabilities, clear action buttons, and improved search/filter options.

How do you currently solve the challenges you have by not having this feature?

Currently, administrators are forced to manually enter each process executable name individually. Managing large numbers of blocked applications requires tedious manual checks and custom documentation to explain the unintuitive checkbox behavior to team members.

2

Hi Hyun-Gyu,

Thank you for the detailed breakdown — the pain points are clearly articulated and the proposed improvements are reasonable from a usability standpoint.

We want to be straightforward with you: while we understand the frustration with the current workflow, a full redesign of the Application Denylist interface — including bulk import, revised status management, and broader table UX improvements — is a significant undertaking. It’s not something we have planned in the near term, and we wouldn’t want to create an expectation otherwise.

That said, this kind of feedback is exactly what informs longer-term roadmap decisions, and we’ll keep it in view as we look at console usability improvements over time. We’ve logged the request.