# Checkpoint Firewall Compliance Report

**URL:** <https://community.netwrix.com/t/checkpoint-firewall-compliance-report/16043>\
**Category:** Change Tracker Ideas\
**Tags:** change-tracker, planned, compliance\
**Created:** [May 29, 2025, 10:50pm UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/checkpoint-firewall-compliance-report/16043 "2025-05-29T22:50:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DevonAnderson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/netwrix/user_avatar/community.netwrix.com/devonanderson/32/1436_2.png) [@DevonAnderson](https://community.netwrix.com/u/DevonAnderson)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 10:50pm UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/checkpoint-firewall-compliance-report/16043/1 "2025-05-29T22:50:30Z")

</div>

### What is a one sentence summary of your feature request?

Omeda would like a compliance report to ensure Checkpoint firewalls are configured securely

### Please describe your idea in detail. What is your problem, why do you feel this idea is the best solution, etc.

No current template exists for creating a compliance report for Checkpoint firewall devices. This leaves a gap for any audit requirement of being able to provide those types of reports.

### How do you currently solve the challenges you have by not having this feature?

No existing way outside of manually verifying the devices using own knowledge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![james.s.anderson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/netwrix/user_avatar/community.netwrix.com/james.s.anderson/32/583_2.png) [@james.s.anderson](https://community.netwrix.com/u/james.s.anderson)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2025, 10:26am UTC](https://community.netwrix.com/t/checkpoint-firewall-compliance-report/16043/2 "2025-06-30T10:26:03Z")

</div>

Hi Devon,

I’ve added this benchmark to our roadmap. We’ll look to get this into the v9 release (September), but we may be able to make it available a little before if the quality of the commands in the benchmark meet our requirements.

Thanks